Joe Biden does not consider himself accountable to the American people
Western politicians used COVID to undermine their own nations’ sovereignty
Given our current trajectory, every aspect of our lives will soon be controlled by unaccountable global elitists
Global serfdom will be pitched as necessary for the Greater Good™
“When you’re dealing with totalitarians, the means are the ends"
Last week, with the full knowledge of purported US president, Joe Biden, a large Chinese spy balloon slowly traversed the country, floating above major US cities, military bases, and nuclear silos. Despite the intrusion becoming public knowledge early in the balloon’s journey, Biden remained silent until he was finally confronted by reporters asking if he would have it shot down.
“We’re gonna take care of it,” was all he said as he got into his SUV to leave.
There was, of course, one — and only one — correct answer to this question: yes, we’re going to shoot it down. But Biden didn’t give that answer; nor did he give any other. Instead, he opted for a noncommittal evasion.
This was a matter of national security, of which Americans were aware and about which they were understandably concerned. But their (supposed) President didn’t think he owed them either an answer regarding his plans or an explanation for his continued inaction.
But his dismissiveness shouldn’t have come as a surprise; it was just another example of the larger global trend toward tyranny. A new normal for a new world order.
Until very recently, citizens of Western nations determined their own futures. They created and maintained governments whose protection made those futures possible. This self-determination was central to their founding values, and thus to them as a people. At least until COVID.
Then, like a terrorist cell going active, leaders across the West sprung into action; moving in lockstep to terminate their respective representative governments under the guise of a “public health emergency.” It was a magnificent piece of choreography, really; and executed with such precision that one could be forgiven for believing that it was a pre-planned, coordinated effort.
Unfortunately, most of the citizenry, panicked by a duplicitous media frenzy, gave into their fear and surrendered blood-bought rights for politicians’ promises of safety. Once that surrender was finalized in the forfeiture of bodily sovereignty, the work of creating a global empire began in earnest.
We, the people of these conquered nations, once the captains of our own destinies, now have our destinies prescribed to us. Those in government no longer consider themselves bound to carry out our wishes, instead demanding that we carry out theirs. Where voters once replaced undesirable politicians, politicians now permit open borders to replace undesirable voters.
Almost daily, it seems control over some additional facet of our lives is seized by those we hired to be our servants. The scope of these seizures is so comprehensive that we are today very close to being truly powerless, regardless of what any law or national constitution may have to say on the matter.
And our elected officials aren’t riding the gravy train of power alone. Unelected (and thus unaccountable) elitists like Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, and the entire Davos cast openly tell us how we will soon live. They do not ask for our consent because they do not need it, and there is absolutely no aspect of our lives that will escape their beneficent intervention.
The brave new world they have planned for us will not be optional. When globalist entities like the World Economic Forum predict that by 2030 we will own nothing, have no privacy, and eat much less meat, they’re not predicting changes we’ll make to our lives, they’re predicting changes they’ll make to them1. And some of those changes have already become reality.
Recently, we’ve seen many new products enter the market to great acclaim. Meat substitutes, cricket flour, light rail, and tiny houses (just to name a few) now appear alongside our preferred options. Seeing these, we might conclude that we now have more choices than ever before. But these are not alternatives, they are replacements. We’re not witnessing an expansion of options, we’re witnessing a transition — from what we want to what they want for us.
In an effort to prevent rebellion, they will, of course, attempt to justify their global serfdom with some fallacious appeal to the mythical “Greater Good.” Per the standard playbook, its premise will be:
Humanity faces a threat so imminent2, so complex3, and so vast4 that it can only be solved by centralizing power in a global authority composed of the world’s best and brightest.
(NOTE: Qualifications for the “best and brightest” will be determined by the best and brightest.)
But as Michael Rectenwald, author of the book “Google Archipelago,” points out:
When you’re dealing with totalitarians, the means are the ends.
In other words, when they tell us we must do X to achieve Y, we can rest assured that X is really their intended goal; Y is just the marketing campaign. So when you hear them justify tyranny by saying, “climate change is why,” you’ll know that climate change is Y.
Had the Chinese blatantly violated our airspace before COVID, the President at that time would have quickly and solemnly addressed the American people from behind the Resolute Desk. He would have assured us that our safety was his highest duty and priority, and that deliberate provocations from our greatest geopolitical foe would not go unanswered. In other words, he would have assured us that he took our concerns seriously.
But Joe Biden did not do this. With a wave of his hand and what amounted to a “don’t worry about it,” he dismissed as unimportant what may have been the rehearsal for a mass-extinction event. Whatever else that says about him, it certainly proves that he does not take our concerns seriously.
And why should he? He didn’t need our consent to obtain the power he has, and he is using that power to ensure that he and his authoritarian comrades never again need our consent for anything else, either.
There’s no time for proper studies or the consideration of alternative solutions
You’re not smart enough to understand. Only our regime experts can grasp its complexity.
It’s too big to be handled by anything less than an all-powerful one-world government